Between Man and Woman: Questions and Answers About Marriage and Same-Sex Unions Introduction A growing movement today favors making those relationships commonly called same-sex unions the legal equivalent of marriage.
Mother Earth Publishing Association, Like most popular notions this also rests not on actual facts, but on superstition. Marriage and love have nothing in common; they are as far apart as the poles; are, in fact, antagonistic to each other.
No doubt some marriages have been the result of love. Not, however, because love could assert itself only in marriage; much rather is it because few people can completely outgrow a convention. There are to-day large numbers of men and women to whom marriage is naught but a farce, but who submit to it for the sake Marriage without love essay public opinion.
At any rate, while it is true that some marriages are based on love, and while it is equally true that in some cases love continues in married life, I maintain that it does so regardless of marriage, and not because of it.
On the other hand, it is utterly false that love results from marriage. On rare occasions one does hear of a miraculous case of a married couple falling in love after marriage, but on close examination it will be found that it is a mere adjustment to the inevitable.
Certainly the growing-used to each other is far away from the spontaneity, the intensity, and beauty of love, without which the intimacy of marriage must prove degrading to both the woman and the man.
Marriage is primarily an economic arrangement, an insurance pact. It differs from the ordinary life insurance agreement only in that it is more binding, more exacting. Its returns are insignificantly small compared with the investments. In taking out an insurance policy one pays for it in dollars and cents, always at liberty to discontinue payments.
Man, too, pays his toll, but as his sphere is wider, marriage does not limit him as much as woman. He feels his chains more in an economic sense.
One has but to glance over the statistics of divorce to realize how bitter a failure marriage really is. Nor will the stereotyped Philistine argument that the laxity of divorce laws and the growing looseness of woman account for the fact that: Added to these startling figures is a vast amount of material, dramatic and literary, further elucidating this subject.
Robert Herrick, in Together; Pinero, in Mid-Channel; Eugene Walter, in Paid in Full, and scores of other writers are discussing the barrenness, the monotony, the sordidness, the inadequacy of marriage as a factor for harmony and understanding.
The thoughtful social student will not content himself with the popular superficial excuse for this phenomenon. He will have to dig down deeper into the very life of the sexes to know why marriage proves so disastrous.
Edward Carpenter says that behind every marriage stands the life-long environment of the two sexes; an environment so different from each other that man and woman must remain strangers. Separated by an insurmountable wall of superstition, custom, and habit, marriage has not the potentiality of developing knowledge of, and respect for, each other, without which every union is doomed to failure.
Henrik Ibsen, the hater of all social shams, was probably the first to realize this great truth. Can there be any thing more humiliating, more degrading than a life long proximity between two strangers? No need for the woman to know anything of the man, save his income.
As to the knowledge of the womanwhat is there to know except that she has a pleasing appearance? We have not yet outgrown the theologic myth that woman has no soul, that she is a mere appendix to man, made out of his rib just for the convenience of the gentleman who was so strong that he was afraid of his own shadow.
Perchance the poor quality of the material whence woman comes is responsible for her inferiority. At any rate, woman has no soulwhat is there to know about her?
Besides, the less soul a woman has the greater her asset as a wife, the more readily will she absorb herself in her husband.By aziz ansari. My parents had an arranged marriage. This always fascinated me.
I am perpetually indecisive about even the most mundane things, and I couldn’t imagine navigating such a huge. Love is not all you need in a marriage There are three keys to an enduring relationship. Love may be important, but communication, respect and trust are essential.
Marriage without love essay. 4 stars based on reviews metin2sell.com Essay.
Medrogestone synthesis essay jamhour taraji vs essaysJamhour taraji vs essays jan us history regents essay american borderland canadian essay forty history ninth parallel regional wests research paper on database security pdf, if i have.
Shakespeare's Treatment of Love and Marriage From Shakespeare's treatment of love & marriage and other essays by C. H. Herford.
London, T. Fisher Unwin, Ltd. The Shakesperean world is impressed, as a whole, with an unmistakable joy in healthy living.
Latter-day Saints believe that monogamy—the marriage of one man and one woman—is the Lord’s standing law of marriage.
1 In biblical times, the Lord commanded some of His people to practice plural marriage—the marriage of one man and more than one woman. 2 Some early members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints also received and obeyed this commandment given through .
An examination of the possibilities for libertarian feminism, taking the feminist thought of the 19th century radical individualists as an example and a guide. We find that the radical libertarian critique of statism and the radical feminist critique of patriarchy are complementary, not contradictory, and we discuss some of the confusions that lead many libertarians--including many libertarian.