Summary of the holocaust essay

The only thing at Auschwitz resembling a human gas chamber was constructed in by Stalin.

Summary of the holocaust essay

Click here to order online from Amazon. Denying History takes a bold and in-depth look at those who say the Holocaust never happened and explores the motivations behind such claims. While most commentators have dismissed the Holocaust deniers as anti-Semitic neo-Nazi thugs who do not deserve a response, social scientist Michael Shermer and historian Alex Grobman have immersed themselves in the minds and culture of these individuals.

They have conducted personal interviews with the deniers, visiting their California and Toronto headquarters, reading their literature, Summary of the holocaust essay their Web sites, engaging them in debate, and even traveling around Europe to conduct research at the Nazi extermination camps.

Analysis of the Holocaust | Novelguide

Uncovering a complex social movement, the authors go much deeper than ever before not only in understanding the motives of the Holocaust deniers, but also in refuting their points one by one.

In the process, they show how we can be certain that the Holocaust happened as it did and, for that matter, how we can confirm any historical event. Shermer and Grobman investigate the free speech issues surrounding Holocaust denial and place them in the larger context of pseudohistory.

They provide a fascinating summary of the major personalities and organizations involved in Holocaust denial, revealing their motives. In their discussion of extremists, neo-Nazis, skinheads, and other fringe groups, the authors explore why people join such groups in the first place, examining the context in which Holocaust denial arises.

Thoughtful, erudite, and original. Denying History broadens our ways of thinking about the claims of those who deny the history of the Holocaust and other historical events.

Summary of the holocaust essay

You will not find a more straightforward Holocaust book than Denying History: The extermination of six million Jews during the Second World War is a historical fact. Those who deny it are wrong. But ask yourself this: Would you be able to refute a Holocaust denier? The fact of the Holocaust is like the spherical Earth: Every reasonable person accepts it, but few can prove it.

They believe thinking people have a duty to fight Holocaust denial head on; and they want them to come to the battle armed with historical facts. The most prominent deniers know a lot about the Holocaust, especially arcane subjects like the chemistry of Zyklon-B gas and the architecture of gas chambers.

Many of the sound bites they spit out are quite true. It is a fact, for instance, that the Nazis never manufactured soap from Jewish bodies on a mass scale — contrary to urban legend. But, as Denying History makes clear, there is still a mountain of evidence proving the nature and scale of the Holocaust.

The estimate of six million killed is supported by a spate of historical studies, and also by Nazi physician Wilhelm Hoettel, who testified at Nuremberg that: He is, by necessity, a conspiracy theorist.

To him, every confession was coerced, every photograph faked. The authors told me in an interview that the only women they see at denier conferences are wives and girlfriends — and that every one is bored out of her mind. But Denying History betrays no contempt for its subjects.

The authors believe everyone has a right to be heard; and they treat Holocaust deniers with clinical detachment. When one is armed with concrete knowledge, however, that fear is lessened and hatred gives way to pity.

After all, historians, government officials, newspaper reports, books, movies, survivor testimony, and the Nuremberg trials all point to the systematic extermination of 6 million Jews by the Nazis during World War II.

But these ideas are the tenets of right-wing extremists, hardly in danger of influencing the mainstream.

Yet Shermer and Grobman do more than just refute ridiculous allegations.

Summary of the holocaust essay

They also use the example of Holocaust denial literature to examine free speech issues, the psychology of right-wing extremists, and the role of biases in historical research.

Events are proven by converging lines of evidence, all of which point to the same conclusion, which — in this case — would be that the Holocaust did occur.Holocaust denial is the act of denying the genocide of Jews in the Holocaust during World War II.

5 page research paper on the holocaust summary

Holocaust deniers claim that Nazi Germany's Final Solution was aimed only at deporting Jews from the Reich but that it did not include the extermination of Jews; that Nazi authorities did not use extermination camps and gas chambers to mass murder .

The Holocaust was the organized wiping out of six million Jews by the Nazi regime during World War 2. In about nine million Jews lived in the 21 countries of Europe that .

Denying History takes a bold and in-depth look at those who say the Holocaust never happened and explores the motivations behind such claims. While most commentators have dismissed the Holocaust deniers as anti-Semitic neo-Nazi thugs who do not deserve a response, social scientist Michael Shermer and historian Alex Grobman .

Summary: MLA (Modern Language Association) style is most commonly used to write papers and cite sources within the liberal arts and humanities. Introduction to the Holocaust The Holocaust was the systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of six million Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators.

The Nazis came to power in Germany in January The UCL Institute of Education (IOE) is the world's leading centre for education and social science research, teaching, and engagement. Undergraduate, Graduate, Teacher Training course information.

Institute of Education